ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Expectations


Undoubtably, there will be those that (fearing a loss of influence) will 
seek, at the last minute, to "reorganize and save the DNSO".   It can be 
reasonably expected that the Assembly will be offered  the opportunity to 
join the Council as a new constituency.  The members of this body need to 
reflect upon such possible choices as we travel down this road.   If such an 
offer is tendered, will we accept three seats out of twenty-four, or do we 
take the position that no less than half the seats will suffice?  Could we 
even consider such an offer before recognition of an individuals' 
constituency is granted?

Do we see a value in saving this Supporting Organization, or is ICANN best 
served by transforming the GA into a cross-SO Assembly in the new proposed 
structure?  It is time for debate.

 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>