RE: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-full@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
|> Patrick Greenwell
|> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:08 AM
|> To: William X Walsh
|> Cc: Peter de Blanc; ga@dnso.org; agenda@dnso.org
|> Subject: Re: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair
|>
|>
|> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, William X Walsh wrote:
|>
|> > > As I said in a previous post, my inclination, as a NC
|> member, would be
|> > > to return the request to the GA based on lack of consensus on the
|> > > "motion". In fact, it is not even a motion. So far I have
|> seen only one
|> > > or two "partial agreements" to WXW suggestion.
|> >
|> > It is indeed sad to see a NC member not willing to step up to the
|> > plate on the issue of GA leadership, and instead passing the buck back
|> > to the GA. If the GA could solve the problem, it would have by now.
|>
|> I'm not certain if the complaint or one or two individuals raises this to
|> the level of a "problem" of the GA.

It only takes one person to raise awareness of an issue for it be open for
analysis.  The spotlight at this time is the productivity and effectiveness
of the GA.  It has been suggested recalling the Chair with more effective
facilitation will address this issue.  Personally, I only see that happening
if we get the right person into the position.  The GA may even end up worse
off otherwise.

If you don't see the current effectiveness and productivity of the GA as an
issue and consider the GA is actually fulfilling all requirements then you
would obviously not see any value in this agenda item.  If you do see the
same issues as I do, you may have alternative solutions.  I would be
interested in viewing them.  At this time, replacing the Chair is attractive
to me.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html