RE: Re[2]: [ga] Re: Roeland's Motion, AMENDMENTS

["Hugh Blair" <hblair@hotfootmail.com>]

I agree with the Motion and the proposed amendments.

-Hugh
____________________________

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of William X
> Walsh
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:55 PM
> To: Joop Teernstra
> Cc: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Re: Roeland's Motion, AMENDMENTS
> 
> 
> Friday, Friday, October 19, 2001, 5:32:15 PM, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> 
> > I would also like to add a clause (Brett's suggestion)
> 
> > 7. The General Assembly re-affirms the GA's commitment to the DNSO as 
> > originally envisaged as a place for cross-constituency dialogue and 
> > consensus building, and requests the Board to fulfil its obligation to 
> > facilitate the entry of thus far unrepresented constituencies.
> 
> And an Excellent suggestion it was.  I agree it should be added.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html