RE: Re[2]: [ga] Ballot question

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

I agree that Joop's online voting booth has proved helpful in the past. I
leave it up to others about whether a ballot is needed... I've already voted
publically...  but note again that others may prefer a secret ballot. 

But I leave this up to the Chair and others to determine. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Asaad Y. Alnajjar - Millennium Inc. [mailto:alnajjar@any-dns.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:35 AM
To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA; 'William X Walsh'; Joop Teernstra
Cc: ga@dnso.org; DannyYounger@cs.com; DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [ga] Ballot question


Dear Marilyn

Early this month we were faced with a similar ballot & voting problem at
AINC.

Mr. Joop Teernstra facilitated for us to do an online voting that was
excellent and very secured as far as all of AINC members concerned.

Why not ask Joop to do the same for the GA?

Regards,

Asaad Y. Alnajjar, P.E.
CEO Millennium Inc.
Exec. Director AINC







----- Original Message -----
From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
To: "'William X Walsh'" <william@userfriendly.com>; "Joop Teernstra"
<terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>; <DannyYounger@cs.com>; <DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 9:53 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [ga] Ballot question


> i have no problem with a public vote, which is why I voted, publically.
But
> there are many who may prefer a secret ballot.  How do we address that?
>
> And, we need to note whether the majority of the GA members vote. If we
find
> that we have a situation where a small portion of the members vote, we
need
> to consider why that is.  We can't declare a consensus if the majority of
> the GA choses not to vote.
>
> I know, I know. I'll get flamed for this opinion, but staying away doesn't
> equate to consent.  If a very small portion of the GA votes, we need to
> acknowledge that and think about how we ask them why that is.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William X Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 12:16 AM
> To: Joop Teernstra
> Cc: ga@dnso.org; 'DannyYounger@cs.com'; DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org
> Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Ballot question
>
>
> Sunday, Sunday, October 21, 2001, 8:06:48 PM, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>
> > At 22:17 21/10/01 -0700, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
> >>Forget burdening the Secretariat.  On the list, publicly, just as
myself,
> >>Marilyn Cade, and Eric Dierker.  Cards on the table folks.
>
> > I respect  those who vote here in plain view of all, but the official
vote
>
> > should be the secret ballot counted by the secretariat.
> > Same argument as I used to question Roberto's call of public support for
> > the Chair's appointee:
> > Not doing so skews the results.
>
> > P.S. My own vote will be in favour of the reworded motion. (thanks
Danny)
>
> When we are talking consensus, the vote should be public, so that we
> can see just how close we are to actual consensus, and those who
> disagree can say why, so we can see if any changes can be made to
> broaden the support.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html