RE: [ga] Songbird in the BC?

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

|> From: Kent Crispin [mailto:kent@songbird.com]
|> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:18 PM

|> Yes, it is interesting.  It proves that the claims that you 
|> and others
|> make about being unrepresented are simply bogus noise.  Anyone who
|> seriously wants to participate can do so.

Then why was New.Net rejected by both the RC and the BC? Why can't MHSC join
either RC or BC?
If you are going to make the point that MHSC never tried, on both counts,
you'd be right. I believe the charters as they were written and recognise an
unwelcome mat when I see one. Unlike some I know, I won't lie just to join a
club.

As far as the NCDNHC goes, I distinctly remember your application ... was it
the "Del Valle yacht club", or something like that? Not that I'd ever accuse
you of joining them under false pretenses ...  We never did make that lunch
date at the "Lemon Grass" and too bad that "New Malley's" has changed
ownership. Pham got tired of working 14x7 shifts. He was the best sushi chef
in the Livermore valley, IMHO. The new place is way expensive and not as
good. How about coffee at "Panama Bay"? Their Sumatra roast is pretty good.
It can't be tomorrow though, I have to go the the 4J's seminar at the Oracle
campus in Redwood Shores.

Claims that all domain name holders are represented, in the names council,
are simply bogus noise. That is a fact that was established and recognized
years ago. You know, I'm really glad to see you post here. That usually is
an indicator that a measure is starting gain some serious traction.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html