<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Re[2]: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings
Hello John,
My impression was that it was custom,ary to file in the defendant's home
turf.
|> From: John Berryhill [mailto:john@johnberryhill.com]
|> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 6:47 AM
|>
|> From: "William X Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
|> >
|> > The issue is that they MUST submit to the UDRP. At the
|> very minimum
|> > the domain registrant should be able to reject the UDRP
|> process, and
|> > thus select to have the matter tried in court should the
|> complainant
|> > think they have a case that meets the higher standard the
|> law places.
|>
|> The problem is that the plaintiff gets to pick where that
|> suit is filed.
|> See, e.g. the sequence of events noted at www.strick.com.
|>
|> UDRP rule 4(k) states that the domain name registrant may
|> decide to take the
|> matter to court at any time, including prior to a decision
|> in the UDRP
|> proceeding. If there is such pending litigation, the UDRP
|> decision will not
|> be implemented. So, how does the present UDRP not do what
|> you are proposing
|> be done?
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|