RE: [ga] Reliability of the Internet - the silent battle - part 2

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

Roland:

How COULD you knowingly circulate a VIRUS on the GA list?  Even if it is
an "example"?

I wish to register a serious complaint with the list monitors on this.

Peter de Blanc

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Roeland
Meyer
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 5:32 PM
To: GA DNSO (E-mail)
Subject: [ga] Reliability of the Internet - the silent battle - part 2


This is an example of something that didn't survive my filters. I looked
at the attachement, it wasn't spam. Rather, it was an attached virus.

I have included the traceroute for validation. It purportedly came from
china. The point is that, file attachments are becoming a less reliable
means to distribute documents.

--- techies-only below here ---

pheonix:/root
Tue Nov  6 13:07:51 [bash:root:59]#> traceroute 211.101.48.83 traceroute
to 211.101.48.83 (211.101.48.83), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets  1
spkez.gw.mhsc.net (216.27.184.225)  5 ms  3 ms  2 ms  2
gw-081-176.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net (216.27.176.1)  27 ms  21 ms  33 ms  3
border3.fe5-3.speakeasy-9.sff.pnap.net (216.52.86.28)  19 ms  21 ms  19
ms  4  core1.fe0-1-bbnet2.sff.pnap.net (216.52.80.65)  20 ms  21 ms  20
ms  5  sl-gw12-sj-1-1.sprintlink.net (144.232.217.17)  22 ms  20 ms  21
ms  6  sl-gw12-sj-9-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.3.145)  25 ms  22 ms  32
ms  7  sl-bb20-tac-11-1.sprintlink.net (144.232.9.214)  56 ms  39 ms  41
ms  8  sl-gw4-tac-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.17.6)  38 ms  41 ms  40 ms
9  * sle-chinatelecom-3-0.sprintlink.net (160.81.25.6)  443 ms * 10
p-13-0-r1-c-bjbj-1.cn.net (202.97.33.9)  502 ms  303 ms  200 ms 11
p-2-0-r1-a-bjbj-2.cn.net (202.97.38.50)  188 ms  201 ms  219 ms 12
202.96.12.50 (202.96.12.50)  287 ms  324 ms  271 ms 13  202.106.193.206
(202.106.193.206)  199 ms  195 ms  196 ms 14  202.108.254.75
(202.108.254.75)  199 ms  197 ms  196 ms 15  211.101.63.2 (211.101.63.2)
500 ms  505 ms  514 ms 16  211.101.63.9 (211.101.63.9)  229 ms  230 ms
231 ms 17  211.101.48.83 (211.101.48.83)  530 ms  553 ms  565 ms

|> -----Original Message-----
Received: from junhoo.com (211.101.48.83 [211.101.48.83]) by
condor.mhsc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2650.21)
	id TTWMVQKL; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:04:47 -0800
Received: from CR380220-A.etob1.on.wave.home.com [24.101.18.46] by
junhoo.com
  (SMTPD32-7.04 EVAL) id AF54350042; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 05:00:04 +0800
From: "0"<0
To: rmeyer@mhsc.com
Subject: Flight crews rely on passengers to stop trouble
date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:12:47 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X MIME OLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Co ntent Type: multi part/m ixed; boun
dary="----41C1485D_Outlook_Express_message_boundary"
Con tent Disposition: Multipart message
Message-Id: <200111070500554.SM00932@CR380220-A.etob1.on.wave.home.com>

------41C1485D_Outlook_Express_message_boundary
Content Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content Disposition: message text

------41C1485D_Outlook_Express_message_boundary
Content Type: application/mixed; na me="Flight crews rely on passengers
to stop trouble.doc.com" Content Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content
Disposition: attachment;  file name="Flight crews rely on passengers to
stop trouble.doc.com"

------41C1485D_Outlook_Express_message_boundary
|> From: 0 [mailto:0]
|> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:13 PM
|> To: rmeyer@mhsc.com
|> Subject: Flight crews rely on passengers to stop trouble
|> 
|> 
|> Hi! How are you?
|>  
|> This is the file with the information that you ask for
|>  
|> See you later. Thanks
|> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html