<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Business Constituency
sounds more to me like he is confirming that the ga has no voice in the
decision making process in the BC
ken stubbs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Cc: "[ga]" <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Business Constituency
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:23:23 +0100, Philip Sheppard wrote:
>
>
> > The Business Constituency has launched an internal
> > debate to revise its charter. To give due respect to the
> > participation of BC members in this debate, the
> > Constituency will not be replying to discussion on
> > this matter outside of the Constituency at this point.
>
> Hi Philip
>
> Are you confirming that the General Assembly has no
> voice in the decision making process of ICANN?
>
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|