[ga] Fw: [Discuss] New insights into the legal significance of "generic"

["Jim Fleming" <jfleming@anet.com>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Fleming" <jfleming@anet.com>
To: <discuss@ador-doc.org>
Cc: <jandl@jandl.com>; "PacificRoot Hostmaster" <idno@tallship.net>; <karl.peters@bridgecompanies.com>; <jo-uk@rcn.com>;
<DannyYounger@cs.com>; <pdeblanc@usvi.net>; <karl@CAVEBEAR.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Discuss] New insights into the legal significance of "generic"


> What advice does ARNI give ?
>
> Are people able to register in the .BIZ registry run by ARNI ?
>
>
> Jim Fleming
> http://www.IPv8.info
> IPv16....One Better !!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>
> To: <discuss@ador-doc.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] New insights into the legal significance of "generic"
>
>
> > ARNI gives no such advice.  In addition, this court case was an Arizona
> > court and was not over another registry's entry but over
> > trademark/tradename and between two registrants in the same registry,
> > both of whom have several domains registered.
> >
> > On 4 Dec 2001, at 21:50, Jim Fleming wrote:
> >
> > > .BIZ existed long before ICANN...
> > > http://www.dot-biz.com/TimeLine/
> > >
> > > People are advised to register in BOTH of
> > > the IPv4 .BIZ registries, for reliable and
> > > redundant DNS service.
> > > http://www.dot-biz.com/DNS101/
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim Fleming
> > > http://www.DOT-BIZ.com
> > > http://www.Register-BIZ.com
> > > http://www.BIZ-Registry.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Karl E. Peters" <bridge@darientel.net>
> > > To: <discuss@ador-doc.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:29 PM
> > > Subject: [Discuss] New insights into the legal significance of "generic"
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Domain Name followers,
> > > >     If the following are not generic names, what are? Who owns a
> > > > trade mark on "sex".  What a concept, eh? The following is from
> > > > another list, but rather pertinent to what we are all about, I
> > > > think...   -Karl
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --------------------------
> > > >
> > > > http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/newdocket/docketformmain.asp
> > > >
> > > > Arizona Superior Court: Case Number cv2001-018340
> > > >
> > > > Where Sex.BIZ, Music.BIZ, and Books.Biz were established as valuable
> > > > trade names and/or trade marks and rights associated with registered
> > > > copyrights as well as use through interstate commerce with first use date
> > > > of 15 Jun 96.
> > > >
> > > > DDRP is invoked and the above domain names will be transferred from
> > > > the defendant's Account with The PacificRoot Registry to that of the
> > > > plaintiff's registry account with the PacificRoot Registry in accordance
> > > > with the court order showing that the Superior Court of Arizona found in
> > > > favor of the plaintiff, in accordance with the provisions of the DDRP
> > > > located at http://www.pacroot/ddrp_current.shtml.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Discuss mailing list
> > > > Discuss@ador-doc.org
> > > > http://ador-doc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discuss mailing list
> > > Discuss@ador-doc.org
> > > http://ador-doc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss@ador-doc.org
> > http://ador-doc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html