Re: [ga] Re: OBJECTION Re: Transfer TF elections

[William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>]

Oh give it up, Danny, you know you are only doing this since it serves
your purpose of trying to be as much a thorn in the side of the NC as
you can.

At least be honest about your reasons for doing it.

I bet a number on this list wished they had backed up my call for the
NC to replace you earlier this year.


Tuesday, Tuesday, December 11, 2001, 1:44:19 PM, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> The General Assembly will be electing a single "voting" representative to the 
> Transfers Task Force.

> This Task Force, as per an un-ratified proposal tendered by the un-elected 
> interim Chair, will determine whether constituencies and the GA may send 
> additional non-voting "observers" to this TF.  That particular message was 
> posted to the TF list on the same day that I tendered my resignation from the 
> TF, and has subsequently been repeated on the TF list.  

> I consider it entirely appropriate that those that have expressed an interest 
> in participating in this TF be given the fair opportunity to participate, and 
> have therefore asked the Secretariat to designate the runners-up in this 
> election as such "observers" (recognizing that no other GA members have 
> expressed any interest in working on this TF and understanding that the 
> number of future TF participants must ultimately be decided by the TF 
> membership itself). 

> Had this been an open working group, all members of the GA would have had an 
> equal opportunity to participate.  Accordingly, I will not seek to deny 
> participation to the only GA members that have thus far expressed any 
> interest or desire in working on this TF.

> Allow me to remind the membership that the General Assembly is "open to all 
> who are willing to contribute effort to the work of the DNSO. The 
> participants in the GA should be individuals who have a knowledge of and an 
> interest in issues pertaining to the areas for which the DNSO has primary 
> responsibility, and who are willing to contribute time, effort and expertise 
> to the work of the DNSO, including work item proposal and development, 
> discussion of work items, draft document preparation, and participation in 
> research and drafting committees and working groups."

> Jeff Williams, Thomas Roessler and Eric Dierker have an equal right as 
> participants as they are all General Assembly members.  It is up to the 
> membership to decide which candidate will best represent our interests as the 
> voting member.  The runners-up in this election (having expressed a desire to 
> participate in the work of the TF) will be accorded the opportunity to do so 
> should such circumstance arise.  

> Those that do not plan to get involved in the substantive work of the DNSO 
> should allow those that are willing to do the work to get on with the job 
> that they are volunteering to do.  Maybe next time, others will volunteer to 
> actually do some work.

> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html





-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Webcertificates.info
SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html