Re: [ga] consensus

["L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>]

Eric,

The point I was trying to make is that one cannot state categorically that
there are and will not not be errors in tranfsers that cause a domain to be
lost to the registrant.  Therefore, there is a necessity to protect the
registrant if it should occur.

William can argue that it has not happened and I can argue that it has
until we are both blue in the face.  However neither one of us can
guarantee it one way or the other, so take steps to allow for the error and
correct it.  No system is perfect.  There is always human error (garbage
in, garbage out) and equipment or communications failure.  If those
contingencies are not covered, there is no protection for the registrant
and the registrar can simply say "tough" as they have done.

Leah

On 13 Dec 2001, at 23:24, Eric Dierker wrote:

> Isn't it normally a compromise of differing positions?  A workable
> position between two opposing sides.
> 
> Is it a give and take between solar opposite positions?
> 
> The pain caused in the GA comes from an intolerance to listen and
> modify.
> 
> We are talking human stuff here not computers and certainly not
> perceived inalienable rights.
> 
> that requires some getting along for the sake of getting along.
> 
> Do you guys always have to one up each other.  This is the baddest ass
> most intellectual group in the world, doesn't just being a member even
> with differences make you the top of your persuasion.  It does in my
> book.
> 
> If there is anything I can do to move you from arguing antogonistist and
> hateful professionals to be contributing members of a contributing group
> of caring professionals, just let me know.  That would be Outreach!
> 
> sincerely,
> eric

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html