<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Re[2]: [ga] Re: VeriSign Proposal a Done Deal??
Joop,
This service would do nothing with your domain name unless you elected
to release it. A domain name is not owned; it never has been. You
register it for a specified period of time and you have the right to
renew it. If you don't it becomes available for others. To use your
logic, your approval would be needed for a re-registration of the name
you formerly registered but deleted.
I must admit that I am rather surprized to see an argument like this
from you.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joop Teernstra [mailto:terastra@terabytz.co.nz]
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 3:33 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [ga] Re: VeriSign Proposal a Done Deal??
>
>
> At 08:43 6/01/02, you wrote:
>
>
> >The value to the Internet community therefore seems rather obvious to
> >me. But, if there is none as you suggest, then the service will be a
> >failure. On the other hand, if there is demand and hence
> value, it will
> >succeed. The level of success will depend on how much
> demand and value
> >there is. The best way to test it is to let the market
> prove it one way
> >or other.
>
> Chuck,
>
> Not only the Market. There is also something called ethics.
> You may put my valuable collectibles on a waiting list for covetous
> companies or individuals, but it would be unethical to do so
> without my
> approval.
>
> Has Verisign such an "approval" system in place?
>
> (hey, you could market it...)
>
> --Joop
>
smime.p7s
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|