Re: [ga] Transfer TF / deletions / WG

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Great so we use the ga-sys list to establish the informal working group.

Subscription is easy;

We can begin immediately.

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:55:26 -0800, Genie Livingstone wrote:
> Subject: Re: [ga] Transfer TF / deletions / WG
>
> > Eric, I like the idea
>
> On Monday, January 07, 2002 5:55 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > > Personally I would like to see our chair use a sublist
> > > and set up a real WG on this issue, all members welcome
> > > and an extra 5 posts a day on that sublist, {or no limit}
> > > for both transfers and deletions.
> > >
> > > Earlier today Mr. Gomes stated clearly it was not
> > > a done deal.
> > >
> > > Isn't a deletion really an automated transfer.
>
> Hi Genie & Eric
>
> Back in April last year a number of special purpose mailing list were set up.
> I saw these as useful for working groups who wished to discuss specific issues
> relating to domain name policy.
>
> One such list was [ga-sys].  This was designed to encompass anything to do
> with registration systems including transfers and expiries.  However, a few
> people opposed the whole idea and without support these so-called "sublists"
> have remained dormant.
>
> I would suggest, therefore, that should GA members wish to set up a working
> group on this topic, the [ga-sys] mailing list is ready made for the purpose.
> People may subscribe to this list by sending an email to majordomo@dnso.org
> with the following words in the body of the text:
>
> subscribe ga-sys
>
> As a reminder, I append the original proposed agenda for [ga-sys] below.
> However, I don't believe the list will succeed without setting up a working
> group.
>
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 22:40:13 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
>
> > Systems:  To consider and recommend improvements to all of ICANN's
> > existing policies, practices and procedures including, but not limited to
> > registry-registrar separation, registrar accreditation, quality assurance
> > and registrant/whois privacy as well as any contracts or agreements in
> > these or related areas.
> >
> > POSSIBLE AGENDA
> >
> > (1)    Structures & Relationships
> > Registry-Registrar Separation
> > Verisign agreement (incl .org)
> > New registry agreements
> > ICANN accreditation & monitoring
> > Anti-trust & competition policy
> >
> > (2)    Existing & Proposed TLDs
> > Review of TLD application process.
> > Holding over of lodged applications.
> > Pre-registrations of domain names
> > Government endorsement of ccTLDs
> > Revision to .edu with Educause
> >
> > (3)    Registry- Registrar Operations
> > NIC handles and other data structures
> > Registrant/Whois data - integrity & privacy
> > Domain name holder's "Charter"
> > Stockpiling & warehousing domains.
> > Expired, on hold & unreleased names
> > Automatic credit card renewals
> >
> > (4)    Multilingual Test-Bed
> > Identify the nature of their operations
> > Test beds or live systems?
> > Controlled by ICANN or not?
> >
> > (5)    Other System Developments
> > NAS Committee on Internet Searching & the DNS
> > MultiBind & other new technology
> > Future of the domain name system
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html