Re: [ga] Using the Sub-Lists

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

You have used this same argument many times and it gets weary, because when you get

agreement by anyone on it, then you kill any reasonable discussion on method.

You are becoming quite regular and predictable which makes it easier to plan on
your obstructionism.  Thank you for that.

I am sure that based upon your hard work VRSN will be pleased to announce that
they tried but got only individual response from us.  Some of us will move forward
without
you and you can cry foul all you want.

Sincerely,
Eric



William X Walsh wrote:

> Wednesday, Wednesday, January 09, 2002, 11:30:25 AM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Right now sublists are not an issue and closure of the GA is not an issue.
>
> > Right now setting up a working group in the ga to handle these matters is
> > an issue.
>
> > Let us not think of ga-sys as sublist let us look at it as a wg-delete forum.
>
> > Let us not think of final results but let us move forward in an open and
> > transparent manner, the results will only reflect our dayly work.
>
> Without it being a formal workgroup, following process, call it a
> workgroup is pointless and couterproductive.
>
> The discussion is on this list, where it belongs, and where it should
> stay.
>
> End of story.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> --
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html