Re: Re[2]: [ga] Using the Sub-Lists

["abel" <able@able-towers.com>]

Assembly,

I think after this mail it is about the time I want to emphasize that mr.
Walsh, in those instances where he speaks on behalf of the congregation,
does NOT speak on my behalf, and his opinion is rarely shared by me, if
ever.

His personalized attacks, however sincere, most certainly are not shared by
me.

Finally a short reminder to mr Gomes, since I send in a few questions
yesterday which in my opinion are of some importance to the subject at hand,
nad since mr Gomes stated to answer, I might perhaps expect an answer in the
not to distant future ?


regards

abel wisman
----- Original Message -----
From: "William X Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
Cc: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>; "William X Walsh"
<william@wxsoft.info>; "Eric Dierker" <eric@hi-tek.com>;
<eric@business.com.vn>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:30 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] Using the Sub-Lists


> Wednesday, Wednesday, January 09, 2002, 3:55:59 PM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
>
> > Hi Thomas
>
> > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc09/msg00252.html
>
> None of which has anything to do with the fact that this discussion
> is where it belongs, on the main GA list.
>
> Why the hell should be continue to waste time arguing over WHERE to
> have the discussion, when the discussion is already on going on an
> appropriate forum, and the participants are quite happy with the
> location?
>
> Why do you continue to pursue this Patrick?  Some attempt at self
> redemption for your failures with regard to sublists in the past?  We
> don't need that kind of interference in the discussion right now.  The
> discussion is occurring, and there is no inherent problem in that
> discussion that warrants even a discussion about moving it.  There are
> no other vital issues before the GA that anyone could even claim this
> is taking time away from, even if that were a valid reason to move
> discussions.
>
> The discussion is occurring, the participants are satisfied with the
> location.  Give up your little personal campaign for redemption already
> and stop interfering with something that doesn't need to be changed.
>
> You can seek your personal redemption somewhere else.
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
> > To: William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> > Cc: Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>; Patrick Corliss
<patrick@quad.net.au>;
> > <eric@business.com.vn>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:38 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Using the Sub-Lists
>
>
> >> On 2002-01-09 11:29:50 -0800, William X Walsh wrote:
> >>
> >> >The discussion is on this list, where it belongs, and where it should
> >> >stay.
> >>
> >> >End of story.
> >>
> >> Precisely that, at least from my point of view.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> >>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> --
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html