ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: WG delete


Thank you George,

(i like your website)

and to Genie and Abel

No to all of your questions.

Simple reason is that integrity is above all the requirement.

There are souls like your own, like our current chair & Joanna Lane that
that have made tremendous impact by just doing their best.

I suggest that your obvious desire to do right and make a difference is the
only true requirement.
(if you doubt me ask Karl our reigning BoD guru at;

Karl Auerbach <karl@cavebear.com>) ask and he will answer!

Likewise while I have spent a degree time in learning these matters, my
desire to further the ccTLDs of VN and MX make me a bad choice.
It appears that I will attend Ghana and I have the professional requirements
to do such a job.  But I am hell bent on my small users of the net and my
developing countries.  I will be here for the group but my obvious and anxious
need to get the internet to farmers in the Mekong Delta and Chiapas make
me a bad choice.  We need you to continue our growth.

In fact I will leave for both physical locales within days.

Think thusly;

the only unnacceptable solution is the status quo, and,
we have a long ways to go and a short time to get there.

Remember also when you go into the light wear major sun block and
your armadillo skin for the beating is brutal and a tough skin is required.

My shoeshine boys with one leg and my school children here need you, they will
be for ever in your debt should you take responsibility to stand tall.

Take my word for it the effort is well worth the return in knowing you worked hard
toward a good goal.

In humble gratittude,
Eric

George Kirikos wrote:

> Hello,
>
> --- Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com> wrote:
> > Ok we are finally starting to resolve on this list.
> >
> > I would like now to see Genie and Abel & George become co-chairs.
> >
> > any objections or refusals.
> >
> > time is crucial
>
> Before deciding, I'd like to hear comments from Chuck and some of the
> registrars -- is further input really required at this point? Given the
> slant of things at the registrar's conference call, WLS seems dead,
> with no firm timeline for its replacement. If Verisign wants to propose
> a formal process to consider all options, that ICANN definitely
> recognizes, I wouldn't mind having some role. I guess as an economist,
> I want to economize my energies, and not waste them in venues that are
> "ad-hoc" and don't make a diffference.
>
> George Kirikos
> http://www.kirikos.com/
>
> P.S. Plus, I've only been on the DNSO mailing lists for a few days, so
> I'd feel a little uneasy at not being fully up to speed on all the
> organizational details, methodologies, and formalities. Being part of a
> large team would be more comfortable for me personally, with
> representatives from the appropriate (even multiple?) constituency/constituencies.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
> http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>