<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] RE: [icann-delete] WLS Input - Greatest Good vs. Benefitsof the Few
William:
>Perhaps you can clear up, Ron, exactly what percentage of new
>registrations those 75 non-participating registrars are responsible
>for (exclusing Verisign's own registrar, of course, whose conflict of
>interest is clear).
>
>The number of registrars is less important to me, and probably to
>most, than the number of registrations they are responsible for.
Using some data available
(bowrrowing David's math from
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc09/msg00258.html
can anyone please help with the blanks?
EST
Marketshare
------Registrar-------------------------WLS
AW Registry (all west) mike brown opposed
1.80% ENOM - Paul opposed
1.07% Tim - GoDaddy opposed
Ken Stubbs - CORE/NC
Bob Connly - PSI Japan obstain
11.17% Elona - Register.com opposed
Donny Simonton - Intercosmos opposed
Steve - DomainBank opposed
Margie - Mark Monitor obstain
45.45% Bruce Bechwith - Verisign Registrar n/c
Mike Paliage
Steinrl - Active ISP obstain
4.34% Bruce Tonkin - MelborneIT opposed
5.23% Tom - Bulk Registrar opposed
1.51% Geoge - Dotster opposed
Sigfried - Joker opposed
8.38% Ross - Tucows opposed
2.66% Werner - CORE opposed
Tom - Slund.de opposed
Jason - Media Venture
Alice's - Rick opposed
David W - IA Registry opposed
Speed Names - Nicoli opposed
Rob - NameScout opposed
>
>If those 75 are responsible, collectively, for less than 50% of new
>registrations, and it wouldn't surprise me if the percentage was
>VASTLY lower than that, then your points here are really
>insignificant, and self serving.
>
Cheers
Genie Livingstone
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|