Re: [ga] Structure Taskforce Update No 3

[Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>]

yOn Thu, 17 Jan 2002, David Farrar wrote:

> DRAFT 4 OUT
>
> Draft No 4 is now at http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-str/Arc00/doc00010.doc
>
> QUORUM FOR ALSO
>
> Draft 3 proposed a minimum 30,000 people have to join the ALSO befoe it could
> elect Board members etc.  In post http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-
> str/Arc00/msg00073.html I suggested 1,000 or so would be a more appropriate
> level.

I would suggest that the minimum level be however many people vote.
All of these "minimum participation levels" are a distraction perpetrated
by entrenched interests with the aim of preventing representation.

Apologies to those that might view this as American-centric(insert your
country of origin if it makes you feel better) but does the U.S. decide
that it can't elect officials unless a set number of individuals or
percentage of the populace vote?

Of course not, that would be stupid.

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
                               Patrick Greenwell
                     Stealthgeeks,LLC. Operations Consulting
                          http://www.stealthgeeks.net
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html