<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] FYI: Posting limit
At 15:39 24/01/02 +1300, DPF wrote:
>1) The DNSO Secretariat (can't imagine they'll ever have more than
>five announcements a day but ridiculous to limit it if there are)
>2) The GA Chair and Alt Chair in their official capacities. To do
>their role properly they have to respond in a timely manner to
>requests, suggestions, feedback and while I am sure they will try and
>do this within five posts a day I don't think it will be productive to
>have complaints against them if they ever go over this. The fact they
>can't judge themselves makes it even more sense to list them as
>exceptions. If they are mis behaving we have the power of recall
>anyway.
>3) Candidates for election. During the period between closing of
>nominations and closing of voting candidates should be able to exceed
>the limit, as has normally been done on an ad hoc basis in the past
>anyway
>
>Note I do not suggest any of the above be exempt from the rules about
>being on topic, no personal attacks etc.
Very sensible exceptions.
--Joop
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|