Re: [ga] WLS: GA questions to Verisign

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Thomas and all assembly members,

Thomas Roessler wrote:

> Russ,
>
> may I, first of all, suggest that you get yourself a decent real
> name in your message headers?  This would certainly increase
> readability, and would let you look a bit more polite.  Thank you.

  I for one, and I am sure I am not alone, appreciate Russ's frankness
and blunt comments.  Very refreshing for a change.  >:) I don't
give a hoot what his mail headers contain or do not contain..

>
>
> On 2002-02-04 20:57:19 -0500, admin wrote:
>
> >I suggest all VeriSign proposals be placed "on hold" until the
> >issues concerning locking domains being transferred to other
> >registrars is resoved.
>
> On 2002-02-04 22:06:59 -0500, admin wrote:
>
> >All VeriSign proposals should be tabled until the locking issue is
> >resolved.
>
> This suggestion of yours is well-known by now.  I'd strongly suggest
> that you don't waste your posting quota on this list (5 per day) by
> repeating this all over the place.

  Providing broad dispersion of a well reasoned opinion is always
a good idea.

>
>
> Also, disrupting discussions on other topics this way is anything
> but helpful.  It also won't help you to get an audience for the
> valid issues you are rising.

  That comments that Russ made here seem to be right on topic
IMHO.  Perhaps one may not agree with them, but that is a
completely different matter entirely..

>
>
> >Those working on the proposal should redirect their efforts to the
> >registrar transfer committee until the issue is resolved.
>
> I _strongly_ disagree.
>
> Of course, assuming that the DNS world stands still until the
> transfer issue (or whatever else you consider important) is
> resolved, you're right.  However, that assumption fails miserably.

  Unfortunately the DNS World does not stand still.  However taking
a brief hold until the Transfer issue which WLS is directly related
to in some aspects, Russ's suggestion is one method or gaining
some stable approach to solving inter-related issues...

>
>
> For instance, we have a deadline to meet concerning WLS questions.

You surely mean that Verisign has suggested a deadline.  That's far
different from "We" have a deadline...

>
>
> May I, for this reason, ask that this thread returns to its original
> subject - questions to Verisign concerning WLS?

  As the transfer concerns or related to WLS and delete, I fail
to see the purpose for this being desirable and especially is not
needed...

>
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html