Re: [ga] RE: [gad] GA Consensus Creation for the KC situation

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Marylyn and all assembly members,

Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:

> Has anyone on the GA who is raising a concern about Kent stopped to ask what
> his job is, and whom it impacts?

  Yes.  And the Announcement seemed pretty clear as well...

> IF it is interfacing with the technical
> community, what is the objection which is being raised?

  Kent has a long history of not working and playing well with others...
This is well documented of course...

> Has the technical
> community objected to his technical credentials?

  Yes on a number of occasions.  Also well documented.

> If his job is something
> else, who is most impacted? what is that sector's thoughts.
>
> Just a thought. My own thought is: "Oh, good; thanks for the update. Now,
> back to work."

  Not surprising that a lobbyist for the failing AT&T, would have this
reaction...  The work now has been somewhat changed as a result of
this Announcement of Kents "Appointment".  As I understand it from
one BoD member, Karl, the BoD was not even consulted on this
appointment/hiring.  Given Kent's controversial history ( IAHC/gTLD-MoU,
POC, PAB, BC membership, Impersonations ect, ect) it would seem
that they will now need to look into this more closely.  More "Make Work"...

>
>
> :-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DPF [mailto:david@farrar.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] GA Consensus Creation for the KC situation
>
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 10:56:08 -0600, k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)
> wrote:
>
> >Because I believe our opinion is valid and counts for something, I think we
>
> >should agree to agree and disagree about this in a formal fashion;
> >therefore from the posts:
> >
> >DNSO GA consensus of Kent Crispin's appointment:
>
> I do not think it helps the GA's credibility to start taking straw
> polls on whether or not we like a particular technical staff
> appointment.
>
> There are more important issues out there.  Only around three GA
> members have commented on the Structure Taskforce drafts!!  Again only
> around three GA members have commented on the proposal to change the
> term or grant a waiver for the NC Chair.  These are issues where we do
> have some influence and or even a vote.
>
> DPF
> --
> david@farrar.com
> ICQ 29964527
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html