Re: [ga] RE: Questions from OPENSRS RSPs Group regarding the WLS proposal

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

No Chuck,

I cannot go so far as to endorse your response.

But it is a calculated hard worked piece of work which reflects your respect
to this forum. Thank You.

I have had my nose broke in Versailles by better men than participate here.
You have held to your word and done well fighting for your client - so to
speak (I am not up to date with in-house lawyer ethics)

Now you must deal with those of us that do not want to throw punches but
want to stop your ship from sailing.

I think that if you fund the At large out of this you may find GA support.

With a few minor tweaks and some subsidiary benefit to users as a whole, why
not let you run with it.

Your headache is better than mine.

Call it a port Tax.

All cities do it.

Eric

"Gomes, Chuck" wrote:

> An HTML version will be posted next week.
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: George Kirikos [mailto:gkirikos@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:20 PM
> > To: Gomes, Chuck
> > Cc: ga@dnso.org; discuss-list@opensrs.org
> > Subject: RE: Questions from OPENSRS RSPs Group regarding the WLS
> > proposal
> >
> >
> > Hi again,
> >
> > --- "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks George.
> >
> > I forgot to ask earlier, is there an ASCII text or HTML version of the
> > document that can be posted? It's hard (impossible?) to cut/paste from
> > the PDFs.
> >
> > By the way, I believe the phase-in procedure with regards to the odd
> > position of names that already have SnapBacks on them is going to ripe
> > for abuse, so Verisign might want to rethink that. In particular,
> > here's what could happen:
> >
> > 1) I own a SnapBack on xyz.com currently, and so in theory no one can
> > buy a WLS on it.
> >
> > 2) In the middle of the night, when no one is watching, I remove the
> > SnapBack (using the 'exchange' feature, to switch it to a different
> > name, or just removing it entirely), and instantaneously (using
> > scripts, or whatever) register the WLS on the same name. From what I
> > can tell, the WLS would be properly processed, thus allowing
> > a "secret"
> > grandfathering of existing names to those "in the know".
> >
> > Thus, I think any transition period/landrush/sunrise really
> > needs to be
> > re-thought. {I'll reserve further comments until I've read things in
> > more detail]
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > George Kirikos
> > http://www.kirikos.com/
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Got something to say? Say it better with Yahoo! Video Mail
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html