ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Diplomacy


Peter,

I no longer see the value in diplomacy when the supporters of cronyism 
finally saw fit to throw out the NC rule book so that Phil Sheppard could 
continue to engage in his shameless manipulations.  What rules will the NC 
discard next?  Instead of constituencies participating in the working groups 
of the GA, this ilk on the Council has already so twisted the Bylaws that the 
GA is totally denied working groups and can only send a solitary member to a 
TF of the NC.  The views of the GA are treated as minority comments worth 
only a single sentance in a report drafted by the BC, instead of as the 
consensus view of the bulk of the DNSO participants.

As a Council member, you have supported this perversion of the Bylaws that 
has denied the GA its voice, and you have done nothing to call an end to the 
Task Force process.  You want a creative and descriptive comment?... Fine...

You have indicated that the ccTLDs no longer desire to remain in the DNSO...  
that's OK by me... get out, you're of no help to us anyway.





--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>