<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Structure TF
- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: [ga] Structure TF
- From: DannyYounger@cs.com
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:49:26 EST
- CC: shankmane@technologylaw.co.il, Laurence_Djolakian@mpaa.org, jse@adamspat.com, bruce.tonkin@melbourneit.com.au, philg@grabensee.com, kstubbs@dninet.net, vany@sdnp.org.pa, yjpark@myepark.com, mueller@syracuse.edu, greg_ruth@yahoo.com, tony.ar.holmes@bt.com, harris@cabase.org.ar, ck@nic.museum, Richard.Tindal@neulevel.biz, rcochetti@verisign.com, grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz, mcade@att.com, philip.sheppard@aim.be, orobles@nic.mx, Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr, pdeblanc@usvi.net, barrister@chambers.gen.nz, MBohannon@siia.net, david@farrar.com, raul@inia.org.uy, jeff.neuman@neulevel.biz, RRODIN@skadden.com
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
The NC Structure Task Force was commissioned after the Montevideo session in
which the NC Chair warranted that the Council would "look at structural
issues - seeking constituency consensus re possible ccSO, ALSC report,
individuals constituency...
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/montevideo/archive/scribe-pf-090901.html
Although the Chair of this TF has written, "I propose we aim to produce an
initial report for 31 January just on the ALSC proposals and evaluate other
proposals from 1 February onwards", there does not appear to be any movement
on the part of the Chair to examine these other proposals (including the
restructuring of the DNSO as proposed by the GA).
Further, the most current version of the Structure Task Force report does not
appear to include any of the significant comments and observations tendered
by the gTLDs, the NCDNHC, the GA, or the ccTLDs.
At one point, the TF Chair wrote: "If you believe in the course of the work
I express bias to a BC perspective against
the other constituencies let me know."
I believe that such bias continues to be demonstrated, and ask that
consideration be given to allowing this TF to select its own neutral chair in
accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the NC. Perhaps another author can
better represent the collective views of the DNSO.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|