Re: [ga] GA summary 2002-08

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Well said for two bookburners and exclusionists.

e

William X Walsh wrote:

> Tuesday, Tuesday, February 26, 2002, 3:00:15 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> > On 2002-02-26 13:53:47 -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> >>I oppose by what is said and what is left unsaid.
>
> >>This is not nor will it ever be under TR more than his propaganda
> >>machine.
>
> > You are entirely free to produce summaries of your own which contain
> > what you believe to be relevant and omit what you consider
> > irrelevant.  All the material you need is there: You are subscribed
> > to the list, and there's a web archive from which you can get
> > information, and to which you can link.
>
> Ignore him.
>
> He posts only to the ga-full list to avoid consequences for his posts,
> and if he wants his posts taken into account on the summary, he can
> post them to the GA list itself in my opinion.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> --
>
> "There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of
> the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer
> interprets the truth."
> -- Jean Giradoux
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html