ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Input Needed


Danny,
Sorry for the short cut in rushing to other things. Obviously a 
restructuring must include a constitutional aspect. My structural approach 
is to say: the ICANN is needed by

- the network managers (inacurately named TLDs) and IP administraors: they 
should be the "ICANN owners" and get final control on the organization 
budget they should pay - for the received service.

- the Internet Participants using the network manager and IP administrators 
services: these Internet Participants are the "Internet owners" and by TLD 
Registrants Communities the "TLD  or (vitural) Nework owners". To get the 
most diversified, representative, efficient and stable representation human 
societies have always used a direct and an indirect ballanced selection 
system (look at the Congress). I therefore say that the SOs must elect 9 
Directors from (open to all) Constituencies (dedicated @large interest 
groups) and the @large as a whole (the ICANN/GA) 9 directors.

Jefsey

On 00:42 28/02/02, DannyYounger@cs.com said:
>Jefsey,
>
>While policies, plans, and tools (your ICP-5, Registrars Rescue, and online
>management method) are important to the equation, what is still lacking is a
>channel by which any given interest group can effectively communicate with
>the decision-makers on the Board.
>
>Simply declaring SOs as open to any organized "constituency" does little to
>ensure that minority views won't be summarily voted down by the entrenched
>interests that currently dominate the process.
>
>In my view, the constituency/council structure is at the root of the DNSO's
>difficulties.  Within the GA, everyone is accorded a voice, all have the
>opportunity to vote, and consensus manages to emerge.  Would you support
>eliminating the Names Council and restructuring the DNSO as a large Assembly
>on the basis of one-man/one-vote?
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>