ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Icannatlarge.com - conflict of interest


Did I walk into the wrong meeting here is this the IDNO group?

She is allowed as an "individual Domain Name Holder"

Since when did the AL accept this policy?

Is someone building an IDNO and calling it the At-Large?

Do I have to go out and buy a domain name through imachination to vote in the
AL?

What is up with this?

Joop Teernstra wrote:

>
>
> I agree with Abel on this. The At Large is the place where Kings and
> commoners stand together. Equally , on a one-woman-one vote basis.
> Marilyn is welcome as a member, and she is expected to represent nobody but
> herself, as an individual Domain Name holder.
> If she seeks to run for office, she is expected to disclosed her interest
> and current role in the BC. Then it's up to the voters.
>
> --Joop
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>