Re: [ga] FW: Comments Received Regarding Revised WLS Proposal

[Harold Whiting <Harold@PeterWhiting.com>]

Rick,
  I stand corrected on that. Thank you.

I still see a strangely biased choice of postings, though.
The most amusing was the one from the Registrar that claimed that current
SnapBack holders would be somehow "disadvantaged" should they not be
allowed to be rolled in to the WLS.  What "group" was this from? Why is it
one of the few "individual" statements to be published?  It does seem to
substantiate the idea that the WLS WILL disadvantage all but the most
technically inclined. Odd, how even the "supporters" of WLS see the
inequity of it too!

--HJW--



At 11:56 PM 3/14/2002 -0800, Rick Wesson wrote:
>
>Harold,
>
>The registrars have not yet submitted their final comments to VGRS because
>we had to vote on the commnets, check the vot, verify the ballot, sign the
>names and cehcek everything again.
>
>I expect that the registrars will release the response to VGRS some time
>tomorrow.
>
>best regards,
>
>-rick
>
>
>On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Harold Whiting wrote:
>
>> The Registrar's Constituency's Formal response to the WLS is missing.
>> How convenient, for it does NOT support the WLS.
>>
>> Also very convenient is the absence of the the expanded discussion over
>> whether the registry was contractually allowed to roll out and charge for
>> this type of service.
>> I do not see this type of service listed in the Registry contract's
>> appendix of "allowed" services that the registry could charge for. 
>> Neither did anyone else.
>>
>> Chuck, if you are going to publish only the feedback that is favorable to
>> WLS, make it clear that that is what you are doing.  As usual, this is a
>> blatantly biased posting by VeriSign.
>>
>> --HJW--
>>
>> At 02:09 AM 3/15/2002 -0500, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>       FYI
>>        
>>       Chuck
>>        
>>       -----Original Message-----
>>       From: Johnson, Terry
>>       Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:29 PM
>>       To: 'jim.foley@neteka.com'; 'mdierstein@namebay.com';
>>       'abel@able-towers.com'; 'info@firstplace.com'
>>       Cc: 'Stahura@enom.com'; Gomes, Chuck;
>>       'donny@intercosmos.com'; 'jarcher@registrationtek.com';
>>       'gbertrand@neteka.com'
>>       Subject: Comments Received Regarding Revised WLS Proposal
>>
>>        To all respondents:
>>
>>       On behalf of Chuck Gomes, thanks once again for taking time
>>       to share your comments and feedback concerning the proposed
>>       Wait Listing Service (WLS).   As stated, it has been our goal
>>       to aggregate the feedback that is collected and post this for
>>       public record to the VeriSign website.  To that end, we have
>>       posted to our website the collective feedback that was
>>       submitted to VGRS, and received at wls@verisign.com as of
>>       4:30P, March 14, 2002.  The URL where these comments
>>       regarding the revised Wait Listing Proposal may be viewed is
>>       at:   http://www.verisign-grs.com/wls.html. (under the title:
>>       "Comments on Wait List Service Proposal")
>>
>>        
>>
>>       Terry Johnson
>>        
>>       VeriSign Global Registry Services
>>        
>>        
>>
>>
>>
>> Harold Whiting -- This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org
>> list. Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe ("unsubscribe ga" in
>> the body of the message). Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>>

Harold Whiting
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html