ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Registrar Constituency WLS Response to Verisign - A DNSOGA Ballot please...


I agree wholeheartedly Jeff, so i assume you are writing a proposal for
the GA to comment upon ?

abel


On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 02:03, Jeff Williams wrote:
> Geroge and all assembly members,
> 
> George Kirikos wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > --- Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > >   It would seem to me that the DNSO GA should also have held
> > > a vote on the WLS and the .ORG delegation statement.  I had requested
> > > these two things before, and received not reply from either Thomas,
> > > or Alexander.  I think Alex had mentioned that the DNSO GA
> > > would be submitting a ballot on the WLS issue.  Alex?   If not,
> > > than again I would like to request again such a ballot be
> > > initiated.
> >
> > There were already multiple opportunities for folks to show their
> > approval or disapproval of WLS (I don't follow the .org issue much).
> > Each time, overwhelmingly the GA was against it. I'm not sure what
> > another vote would prove.
> 
>   Well George it would PROVE that first the DNSO GA members
> can show their interest and position in a official way to the WLS and
> .ORG divestiture proposal.  Second, without an official vote on these
> matters, the ICANN BoD can claim that the DNSO GA is a nearly
> useless part of the DNSO which they are already trying to do now,
> and anyone can latter claim that the DNSO GA members had no
> official position on the WLS or the .ORG divestiture issues...
> 
> > It might be a step in the reverse direction,
> > too, in that a "200-20" vote is just numerical, whereas having folks
> > provide their name along with their position, as has happened in the
> > mailing list, is more forceful. Anonymous voting in the age of the
> > internet would be very difficult (one side could easily sign up a few
> > hundred or thousand "supporters" to manipulate a vote where the voters
> > are anonymous). The way the RC did it, with registrars voting in
> > public, is best, as it's less open to manipulation (similar to how
> > voice votes were held in ancient Greece).
> >
> > WLS was mentioned on Slashdot, too, where it was derided.
> >
> > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/14/0649205&mode=thread
> >
> > It's unclear that Verisign respects democratic institutions, in any
> > event. At some point (maybe we're well past that already), we might
> > need a "Magna Carta" to limit the power of this monarchy.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > George Kirikos
> > http://www.kirikos.com/
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> > http://sports.yahoo.com/
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
-- 
Abel S.H. Wisman

Scottish Provident House 
76-80 College Road
Harrow Middlesex
HA1 1BQ 
UK
+44 20 8424 2422
+44 78 1214 1916

www.able-towers.com
www.url.org
www.grid9.net
www.telesave.net

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>