Re: [ALSC-Forum] RE: [ga] Substance over rhetoric - a constructive challenge

[William X Walsh <william@cyberspaceassociation.info>]

I'd be concerned about the use of the membership list that Joop is
compiling as well.

He was in charge of maintaining the membership list in the IDNO as
well, and when he was removed from that roll by the members, he has
steadfastly refused to provide that membership list to the newly
elected membership committee, despite repeated requests.

He always seems to say he does not have the time to do it....how hard
is it to email a single file as an attachment?

So consider yourselves forewarned, if the group tries to get its
independence from him, expect him to obstruct it with every means at
his disposal, including the list of members and their contact data.

Sunday, Sunday, March 17, 2002, 5:22:17 PM, Joop Teernstra wrote:


> At 19:07 17/03/02 -0600, Kristy McKee wrote:
>>I don't understand why anyone who is already a member of the At Large & 
>>has already voted and has had representation in ICANN should be required 
>>to sign up a second time.

> Kristy,

> ICANN does not want anyone to use the "old" members' list for outreach. In 
> ICANN's view, these members were disposable members, good only for a single 
> election.

> Nothing of this list is public, not even the names. We only know for 
> ourselves that once we were verified members with PIN numbers and all.

> Therefore, the only option left was to start afresh, transparently and from 
> the bottom up and create a place where the At large members can communicate 
> with each other, and, hopefully<g>, with ICANN.
> That is what www.icannatlarge.com is about.


> --Joop





-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
--

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html