ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] what IF


Eric and all assembly members,

eric wrote:

> My opinion here is not technical but socio/strategy

  Oopsy!  Did I just hear the other shoe drop, or is this the sound
of one hand clapping?  >;)

>
>
> Sorry for the over addressing but my ga posts have been banned secretly.

  Well Thomas does have a socio as we all know, not to mention
a obvious math deficiency...

>
>
> Jefsey believe it or not, that is my job.
>
> We are quite certain that different functionaries would simply separate.
> Like floating orbs.
>
> IETF: would continue to function just fine.  Their recommendations or
> RFCs would still find their way to necessary performers.
>
> IANA:  This is worrisome because some actual mechanics would have to
> revert to the DoC.

  Well I don't think that DOC want's it back..  Nor should it really..

>
>
> "Root Servers": ICANN does not really have a full handle on this
> technical function but we wonder if they acted totally independent what
> would occur, probably no different from today. Why wouldn't they work
> together?

  Well oil and water don't mix too well.  So maybe there is some
similarities? >;)
Just a thought of course.

>
>
> "SuperNics":  This would not change immediately unless some idiot
> actually flipped switches of some sort to break the connections of
> whatever sort.  They have plenty of IPs in reserveleg

  IP's are only one leg of the operational stool so to speak.

>
>
> Versign and down the food chain:  If the system does not work they will
> lose money, they will cooperate and continue to work for the best return
> they can muster.

  Or roll their own...  Pardon the metaphor...

>
>
> Probably most important are blocks of users, whether they be like a ccTLD
> like UK or a dotCN.  There would be splintering on a political basis and
> we would race to establish new alliances.

  Politicians luv new things political such as new alliances.  Its like
a habit forming drug to processional politicians.  Once hooked on it,
then got to have more and more.

>
>
> I think we would have some chaos until men like you and Joe B. and Jim F.
> rise up and competitive systems stabilize in a voluntary system that
> takes economics and politics into consideration. I know it may sound
> radical but you posed the question.
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric
>
> Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>
> > Just a question to those who really know...
> > What if the ICANN closed shop?
> > Could someone(s) provide a fair timing of what would happen and when?
> > when / who would notice?
> > jfc
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>