Re: [ga] Re: Request for a Working Group

["Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>]

1. I don't like it.  ICANN has no relevant competencies.  And it leads to
function gallop.

2. I suggest as part of the ICANN reform we stop it.

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Michael,
> 
> Whether you like it or not, we currently regulate the registrar community by 
> way of contracts (such as the Registrar Accreditation Agreement).  These 
> contracts specify registrar obligations, and how they are to attend to 
> "Business Dealings, Including with Registered Name Holders" (section 3.7).  
> This puts the issue of registrar practices squarely within ICANN's purview, 
> and creating modifications to this contract language indeed falls within the 
> ICANN consensus process.  
> 
> Clearly we have a right to establish provisions to curtail nefarious business 
> practices in order to "enhance user choice and satisfaction".  
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's warm here.<--

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html