[ga] Re: [ALSC-Forum] http://wecann.com

[Derek Conant <dconant@dnsga.org>]

The DNSGA offers to host the proposed website.

DNS as follows:

NS1.NSERVER.NET              209.196.48.203
NS2.NSERVER.NET              209.235.23.219

Derek Conant
DNSGA President and Chairman


Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> Gary Osbourne has accepted to review may project of site. Garbiel Pinero to
> help with Spanish words. I will try to provide some French. If someone
> could help with German, Japanese, Chinese? I suppose the text will be kept
> very terse, but a review in the different languages might help.
> 
> I have asked Ross if he could help with hosting, but I was suggested that
> hosting by one of the proposer could be misleading? Could someone propose a
> free hosting for a less than 2 Meg site?
> 
> I suppose that something interesting for all of us to understand the
> propositions is to be able to ask questions to the authors (Danny, Ross,
> Lynn, Dave, ..).
> 
> Thank you for rising questions. I will list a few of mines: we could
> aggregate them in a list of FAQs.
> 
> 1. do you think the ICANN is invested net leadership authority or net
> keeping duties?
> 2. do you think the ICANN should be equal to all through policy documents
> (IPC) or should match every specific situation though contracts?
> 3. do you think the ICANN constitution should consider US local tax/legal
> aspects or to be establish and to look for a location where its own
> requirements can be met?
> 4. do you think that competition fostering must be organized or should it
> come from the way the same rules apply to all?
> 5. in your opinion who are the real owners of the Internet: the
> registrants, the participating services, the governments, the Internet
> Participants at large (existing/future), the ICANN?
> 6. how do you think dedicated International aspects should be addressed?
> Through an union of national communities with dedicated interest groups, or
> an union of dedicated interest groups with their own national chapters, or
> a more sophisticated mix?
> 7. the number of TLD has very slightly increased, so has the number of
> protocol  number. The number of IP blocks has stayed the same. What are
> your reasons for a significant budget increase from the Jon Postel days?
> What are the criteria for it to expand instead of staying stable?
> 8. should the revenues from the ICANN result from a "tax" system to support
> a community need, and who should pay that tax? or from a contribution from
> its "clients" for the rendered services? On which principles?
> 9. we observe that the ICANN interfaces the external world through the SOs,
> clearly dedicated to each of its missions. Some ambiguities result from
> their rigidness and exclusive relations with designated constituencies. Do
> you think that the constituencies of stake holders is a good solution? Do
> you think there should be more, less of them? Do you think the
> constituencies should be able to relate with all the SOs they are concerned
> with?
> 10. the idea is that the BoD may include the most diversified team to be
> sure that it will include competence on every matter of ICANN
> responsibility and global interests. Do you agree with this? In most of the
> human institutions such a diversification and the risk of polarization are
> addressed through balanced direct and indirect elections - like in most of
> the democratic Congresses. Do you support that approach resulting in a 9 SO
> originated and 9 @large originated BoD? Why? Why would you prefer another
> system? Would you have successful examples of the kind of system you
> support in national or international organizations?
> 11. The organization of the DN sales force (Registrars) has gained
> importance and many specific problems have developed with the Registries.
> This makes the ICANN to look like a professional association without
> powers. How would you address that situation?  The same the IP addressing
> is increasingly perceived as a major problem. How ill you address that issue?
> 12. Transparency and consensus building are important issues complex to
> address in an international network environment. What are the methods or
> structural orientations you favor to impose transparency, reduce the bylaws
> fluctuations, improve the relations with the GAC and external organizations
> such as contents providers, Telcos, ITU/T, consumers, etc...
> 
> Jefsey
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html