<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] GA rules?
Friday, Friday, March 29, 2002, 6:44:29 PM, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> Dear List Monitors:
> Does the GA still have rules that stipulate that messages must be relevant to
> the business of the GA, and that the messages must observe a minimum of
> decorum, including not indulging in personal attacks or insults?
> The message posted at http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc10/msg00102.html
> does not appear to be relevant to the GA's business, and decorum seems to be
> seeking its lowest level.
Much like your messages attacking the integrity of ICANN Board members
and Names Council members? But that's ok, because it suits Danny's
agenda.
BTW, as a former chair of the GA, I would assume you know the proper
process for making a complaint to the moderators. If you have a
problem with my post, then use the process. I stand by what I said.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|