Re: [ga] GA rules?

[eric <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Dang,

Our chair stands so irrelevant!

Eric

Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 2002-03-29 21:44:29 -0500, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>
> >Does the GA still have rules that stipulate that messages must be
> >relevant to the business of the GA, and that the messages must
> >observe a minimum of decorum, including not indulging in personal
> >attacks or insults?
>
> Yes.
>
> >The message posted at
> >http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc10/msg00102.html does not
> >appear to be relevant to the GA's business, and decorum seems to
> >be seeking its lowest level.
>
> No complaint has been submitted to the list monitors at
> ga-abuse@dnso.org, as far as I can see this.  If you want to
> complain about a specific message, please do so.
>
> There's no point in publicly complaining about inactivity of the
> list monitor when you didn't even _try_ to draw his attention the
> message in question first.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html