<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Reseller hiding WHOIS info
Eric
Doesn't seem to me that Danny was talking about "personal information" at
all, rather he was referring to the contact data of the reseller.
He is also correct in stating that the reseller should be displaying the
registration agreement of the registrar through whom they are procuring
the name. This is spelled out in clause 3.7.7 of the Registrar Accreditation
Agreement.
jon
>-- Original Message --
>From: eric@hi-tek.com
>Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 08:32:23 -0700
>To: DannyYounger@cs.com
>CC: ga@dnso.org
>Subject: Re: [ga] Reseller hiding WHOIS info
>
>
>Danny I note your concern,
>
>However I share a more private attitude toward disclosure.
>
>This whole misbegotten notion of publicly airing all your underwear simply
>because you have something to do with a domain name is ridiculous and a
result
>of
>an imbalance between corporate America and users of the net.
>
>Now you can continue to walk this path or you can begin to correct the
stupidity
>of it. Your point may or may not be correct but this damned demanding
of
>personal information in order to do something on the internet is ridiculous.
>
>Sincerely,
>Eric
>
>DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>
>> I received a solicitation by mail to register a .us domain. The letter
>had a
>> return address in Singapore (a PO box). As I looked into the details
of
>this
>> service provider, I noted that the WHOIS database provided no telephone
>or
>> fax contact number and that it was under registrar lock. The organization
>> that sent this letter, IRWW, doesn't appear to be either an ICANN-accredited
>> registrar nor a .us accredited registrar, nor have a phone listing available
>> through NY directory information. Its service contract doesn't specify
>a
>> registrar-of-record either.
>>
>> Questions:
>>
>> 1. As consumers, don't we have a right to know the full contact details
>of
>> domain registration providers?
>> 2. Why are such details not available through the WHOIS in this instance?
>> 3. If a registrar provided the registrar lock service, isn't that registrar
>> aware that the WHOIS details are incomplete? Isn't this a willful violation
>> of section 3.3.1.7 of the RAA?
>>
>> Registration Service Provided By: Internet Registrations World Wide
>> Contact: info@irww.com
>> Visit: http://www.irww.com
>>
>> Domain name: irww.com
>>
>> Registrant Contact:
>> Internet Registrations World Wide
>> Bradley Norrish (mail@irww.com)
>> -
>> FAX: -
>> 1040 Avenue of the Americas
>> New York, NY 10018
>> US
>>
>> Billing, Administrative Contact:
>> Internet Registrations World Wide
>> Bradley Norrish (mail@irww.com)
>> -
>> FAX: -
>> 1040 Avenue of the Americas
>> New York, NY 10018
>> US
>>
>> Technical Contact:
>> Internet Registrations World Wide
>> Bradley Norrish (mail@irww.com)
>> -
>> FAX: -
>> 1040 Avenue of the Americas
>> New York, NY 10018
>> US
>>
>> Status: REGISTRAR_LOCK
>> Note: To help prevent malicious domain hijacking and domain transfer
>> errors, the registrant for this domain has chosen to prevent
its
>> transfer. Any attempted transfers will be denied at the registry.
>> The apparent authority (registrant) for the name must unlock
the
>> name at the current registrar in order for a transfer initiation
>> to succeed.
>>
>> Name servers:
>> ns1.irww.com
>> ns2.irww.com
>>
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|