Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract

[William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>]

I disagree with the DNSO GA considering this motion, because it would
do irrepairable harm to the GA's ability to assert itself within the
ICANN process.  It is counter productive, and serves no constructive
purpose whatsoever.

Thursday, May 02, 2002, 5:14:29 PM, Joanna Lane wrote:

> PLEASE INDICATE YOUR PREFERENCE  BELOW.

> Mr. James Love, a member in good standing  of the DNSO's General Assembly,
> has made a call for action, specifically stating:

>  "I move that the GA poll its members, to record its views on whether or not
> the US Department of Commerce should have an open competition for the
> services now provided by ICANN. The rationale for asking for a rebid is that
> ICANN has dramatically changed the initial terms of reference for ICANN, and
> is proposing even further changes, which have met extensive opposition in
> the Internet community. The rebid would allow the NTIA to consider
> alternatives to the current ICANN plan for managing key Internet resources.

> The vote should be taken within 10 days."

> Seconds: John Palmer, Danny Younger.

> Members who have indicated their agreement with taking a Vote:-

>   1.. James Love (Proponent)
>   2.. John Palmer (Second)
>   3.. Danny Younger (Second)
>   4.. Jeanette Hoffman
>   5.. Joanna Lane
>   6.. Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>   7.. Karl Auerbach
>   8.. .
>   9.. .
>   10..

> Members who have indicated their disagreement with taking a Vote:-
>   1..
>   2..
>   3..





-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html