Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract - update 1

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Eric and WXW,
we are about serious things, disputes on personnal agenda are out of scope. 
We are only a few - the DNSO GA peopoe - to know that the world is not the 
ICANN and yet that the ICANN could help the world. The error of the ICANN 
is to try to manage and develop the LegacyNet instead of serving the whole 
Internet. The second error are its structurers inherited from Jon Postel's 
reading by Joe Sims (I suspect Jon Postel would be surprised).

We have had a dream period with Ira Magaziner, Mike Rroberts, etc.. I am 
not sure Lynn understands what is at stake, but he has risen the question. 
And the question is worth more than an ICANNpatch.

IMHO a new contract would oblige the USG to pragmatically review and commit 
on the ICANN duties. Itis the only way to have it dialoging with the ITU/T 
and being protected from the ITU/T. IMHO that contract could also be with 
the EEC, the Minc, the AINC, New.net, Open Roots, RIR, gTLDs, etc.

The momentum may certainly come from the GA as it did for Plan B.
I thank Joanna for her effort and Thomas to support that debate. We all 
have diofferent opinions and styles: for once please let use them to call 
for a debate with others rather than arguing internally.

Jefsey


On 10:01 03/05/02, eric@hi-tek.com said:

>I thought we should all share this moment as WXW has finally made his last
>bid to become an ICANN staff member.
>
>I for one applaud the effort and hope that he is welcomed with open arms.
>
>It is always better to isolate a virus and place it in quarantine with
>others of its' parasitic ilk.
>
>Perhaps we should not ask the DoC for a rebid but instead ask the Dept. of
>Agriculture for a Quarantine.
>If it wasn't so repulsive it would be contagious and a public health
>hazard.
>
>This is quite a pastime but the real work remains outside in the real
>world.
>
>Eric
>
>William X Walsh wrote:
>
> > This "motion" is nothing but an attempt by some vocal ICANN critics do
> > try and create an "embarrassment" for ICANN so they can say that
> > ICANN's own DNSO General Assembly has said "blah blah blah" and use
> > that in their media plays.
> >
> > It is ill-times, counter productive, and those who support it are
> > doing everything possible to try and rush it through.
> >
> > I hope our elected chair will be the leader he has shown himself to be
> > and resist such efforts.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> > --
> > Save Internet Radio!
> > CARP will kill Webcasting!
> > http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/02
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/02