ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Slashdot.


Well sh--,

You have a good point here William.

I think in general we have a problem houston.

This is what I have been putting off outreach about.

You have any solutions?

E

William X Walsh wrote:

> Monday, May 06, 2002, 5:57:42 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > We really have to do some thinking here.
>
> > Do you want new people or not.  You cannot greet them with a closed club
> > attitude and act like they do not belong here if they have not been here
> > and really do any kind of outreach.  You cannot only welcome seasoned
> > engineers and expect this bottoms up experiment to work.
>
> The issue, Eric and everyone else, is that they are coming in for the
> sole purpose of trying to influence the outcome of a single issue, not
> to be a part of the overall process.
>
> If the outreach was to have a voice within the ICANN/DNSO process,
> rather than recruiting people for the specific purpose of supporting
> Jamie's attempt at trying to embarrass ICANN at the expense of the
> legitimacy of the DNSO GA, then I would have no problem with it at
> all.
>
> But in this case, it is ONLY resulting in getting voices to back up
> his little agenda.
>
> And in so doing, he has proven ICANN right about the GA, and further
> justified their completely ignoring us.
>
> Bravo, Jamie, Bravo.  You have played right into their hands.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> --
> Save Internet Radio!
> CARP will kill Webcasting!
> http://www.saveinternetradio.org/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>