Re: [ga] Point of Order

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@worldatlarge.org>]

Ken Stubbs wrote:

>please explain why this is not a legitimate point of order here..
>is it because you dont like mr walsh  ?
>
Not at all!  In fact, I like Mr. Walsh... he's entertaining.  As for his 
"point of order", it does not come from the ICANN Bylaws which only 
states the following about the composition of the GA:

"(b) The DNSO shall consist of (i) a Names Council ("NC"), consisting of 
representatives of constituencies as described in Section 3 of this 
Article VI-B ("Constituencies") elected by those Constituencies and (ii) 
a General Assembly ("GA"), consisting of all interested individuals and 
entities."

There is NO mention whatsoever in the ICANN Charter about what qualifies 
or does not qualify as legitimate GA deliberation/vote material, and I 
challenge Mr. Walsh (or anyone else) to show where in the ByLaws it 
does.  After all, Mr. Walsh contends that his "point of order" is 
dictated by the ICANN Charter.  The onus is on Mr. Walsh to produce the 
relevant ByLaw stipulation.

Sincerely,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos

P.S.  I have gone over the posting limit and I'm aware of this, I can 
only ask for the GA's indulgence on this wise.

.




--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html