Re: [ga] Negative outreach norms, board claims regarding consensus in favor of "reform" efforts

[William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.com>]

Wednesday, May 08, 2002, 1:09:40 PM, James Love wrote:

> 2.  One reason to have this vote is that the ICANN board and staff are
> telling governments (everywhere) that they have a consensus in the "Internet
>  community" on the reform process.  And if they say so, who is to say
> otherwise?

The instead develop a DOCUMENT that details the disagreements, float
it for discussion here, and see if consensus develops within the GA
that goes against ICANN's reform proposal.

THAT would be within our charter.

Posting a resolution demanding a rebid is NOT within our charter, and
is out of order.

If you want to indicate support for that, do what I suggested earlier,
Jamie:

> I would suggest to Jamie, that he put his
> position forward in a more indepth position paper and welcome
> individual GA members to sign on to it or not.  This would not make it
> a statement BY the GA, but GA members would certainly be free to
> support it.  Jamie has his lobbying group, they can certainly
> spearhead such a statement, he doesn't need to try and use an internal
> ICANN body to try and embarrass ICANN to get his point across.



-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html