Re: [ga] Point of Order

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Roberto and all assembly members,

Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> William X Walsh wrote:
> >
> >I call on the Chair to table the motion by Jamie Love and others.
> >
>
> I respectfully disagree.
>
> I am against the motion, because it be the death of the GA.

  Interesting.  Two days ago yo said you were undecided on
Jamies motion.  Have you now decided that you are not in favor
of it?  How could such a motion Kill the GA?

>
> I am against tabling the motion, because by not abiding the rules the Chair
> will kill the GA.

  Again this is not a good reason either.  Tabling or not tabling
any motion cannot effectively KILL the GA.

>
>
> The effect is the same, but as explained in a previous message, I am not
> willing to sanction self killing, but I will sanction killing of others.
>
> Let the will of the (new forming) majority of the GA (voting registry, not
> mailing list) prevail: it will be absolutely irrelevant for the matter, as I
> cannot think for a second that USG will give any credit to a small group,
> rallied at the last minute.
> It will be relevant, though, to demonstrate that individuals cannot
> self-organize and produce meaningful results.
> What DNSO NC, ICANN BoD, and many others have argued ever since.
>
> Incidentally, has anybody thought that ICANN is doing *exactly* what USG is
> expecting it to do, and therefore there is no whatsoever reason to kill it,
> if not to create further delays before creating a photocopy of it? I have
> lived this experience in Italy in the 60's and 70's, when governments failed
> confidence votes were replaced after long and thorough consultation by ...
> the same people over again.
> The CEOs and the BoD Chairs of ICANN have been and are all US citizens,
> whose election/nomination was done with the placet of (if not following
> direct nomination from) the USG. Why would you think that they are acting
> not in line with the owner? Moreover, USG has had, and still has, the lever
> of the power. It could have warned or even stopped ICANN with a phone call,
> had it wanted. It did not, because ICANN is doing exactly what is supposed
> to do: slowing down the introduction of new TLDs, not hurting NSI/Verisign,
> favour IP (not the protocol, the property) and big business versus
> individuals and small guys, window dressing this with a zest of
> internationalism, that is to hold meetings also outside the US. Actually,
> after September 11, better if *all* meetings are held outside the US, in any
> case this will not affect the center of power, it will be just more dust in
> our eyes.
>
> Well, I have my squash partner waiting for me, see you later.
> Roberto
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
> --
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html