Re: [ga] Text of ballot question

["James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>]

William, you can say whatever you like on the list.  You can repost private
messages, messages from other lists, stuff from press interviews, I don't
care.  I have no idea what you think your point is.  Is there any doubt that
but we want the DoC to recompete the ICANN contracts, or that we think it
would be useful for the GA to also back this?  Is there a "PR value" in a
statement from the GA?  I would hope so.  That would mean that people
actually care what the GA says.   How could this not be clear, both on and
off list?    And how would it be a bad thing if a GA statement was actually
noticed by people?

  Jamie

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X Walsh" <william@wxweb.com>
To: "James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Text of ballot question


> Thursday, May 09, 2002, 10:16:38 AM, James Love wrote:
>
> > Nice to know what offlist means to you.  Which is fine.  But also
something
> > to keep in mind.
>
> What, you expect to be able to say one thing on the list, and
> something off the list, and not expect someone to call you on it?
>
> I've posted this to the GA list too, so that others can see that this
> is exactly what you were expecting.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxweb.com>
> --
>
>
>


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html