<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] On the "rebid" vote: Now we're getting somewhere!
At 09:51 a.m. 9/05/2002 -0700, William S. Lovell wrote:
>I'd suggest that, starting with Jamie's "motion," we most politely and
>subserviently ask our stalwart work horse, Joanna Lane, to consolidate
>these posts into a single document that identifies each motion
>numerically, as in "#001 -- "Rebid" -- Proponent - James Love"; "#002 --
>"Rebid" -- Proponent - "Dan"; etc.
You could not have said more clearly that the Chair is not doing the job he
was elected for:
Processing motions and facilitating the expression of the Assembly's consensus.
--Joop
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|