[ga] ...but we lied

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

We said that "Our goal is to replace each and every one of the current Board 
members as soon as possible", ...but we lied.

We said that "it is ICANN's highest priority to complete the work necessary 
to implement a workable At-Large membership structure and to conduct 
elections for the nine At-Large Directors that must be chosen by the 
membership", ...but we lied. 

We said that "The bylaws now make it clear that the Board has an 
unconditional mandate to create a membership structure that will elect the At 
Large Directors of the Board", ...but we lied.

We said that we will reserve Article II of our Bylaws "for use when the 
Corporation has members", ... but we lied.

We said that ICANN will "operate to the maximum extent feasible in an open 
and transparent manner and consistent with procedures designed to ensure 
fairness" ... but we lied.

We said that "ICANN must facilitate the translation of final documents into 
various appropriate languages" ...but we lied.

We said that the task of the Independent Review Panel Nominating Committee 
"is well underway, and should be fully implemented within a few months" 
...but we lied.

We said that "Some remain concerned that the Initial Board could simply amend 
the bylaws and remove the membership provisions that we have just described 
above. We commit that this will not happen." ... but we lied.

How many more lies to the US Government should be tolerated?  Would anyone 
like to offer a rationale as to why this incumbent ICANN management should be 
trusted?  All I see is lies and more lies.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html