<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: [GA] ICANN conflict of interest policy and spousal employment
jefsey wrote:
> hmmm, I suppose that t byfield made a lapsus calami and meant:
> "i'd like to suggest that the GA consider a resolution advocating a
> change to ICANN's conflict-of-interest policy so that it does not
> cover anymore spousal employment.".
Ha! Some humour!!! Nice to see someone can still approach such matters
with a keen wit; it bolsters a healthy cynical approach to such
distasteful goings-on. My word! tsk tsk.
> I second that proposition.
I am howling with laughter jfc!!!
>
> I feel there is a consensus on the matter, at least by 2/3 of an
> undisclosed part of the ICANN community, what matches the
> non-transparency prerequisite.
> jfc
This is a Jefsey classic for sure.
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Toronto, Canada
"Go Leafs go!"
http://www.mapleleafs.com/playoffs02/news.php?ID=611
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|