ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Ballot discussion


Marc Schneiders
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:24 AM
> To: Alexander Svensson
> Cc: DNSO General Assembly
> Subject: Re: [ga] Ballot discussion
> 
> 
> What is wrong with:
> 
> Motion 1
> [ ] agree
> [ ] do not agree
> [ ] abstain
> 
> Motion 2
> [ ] agree
> [ ] do not agree
> [ ] abstain
> 
> Making it a one vote thing reduces the chances of either motion getting
> 50% to a large degree. In fact, the addition of the second motion could
> then easily be interpreted as an attempt to make sure that there is
> practically no consensus outcome of the vote possible. Or, if one is
> suspicious, as a means to silence the GA.

I agree with this format for the reasons stated by Marc Schneider.

Regards,
Joanna 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>