<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] NC BS
Danny and all assembly members,
Well of course this is strictly BS as you rightly indicate in the subject
line. I am wondering why this was not announced via the
announce list...??? In any event this is simply and only a
recommendation. As such, perhaps the GA members should
consider a vote on it for or against...????
DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> For those of you who were sleeping, the Names Council has passed this --
> "Recommendation 24 - general assembly. The gTLD policy development body
> should have a general assembly whose prime role is to provide a forum for
> broad inter-constituency exchange. Consequently, membership should be limited
> to the agreed stakeholders who are represented in the policy development
> body."
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|