ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] NC BS


"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" wrote:

> An ICANN that fails to either limit its mission so that voting isn't
> important, or that fails to honor the commitment to 50% control by
> an at-large made up predominantly of end-users, is going to be an incumbent
> and insider protection society.  Unattractive.  Irresponsible.  Unstable.
> In fact, doomed.

Thank you. That is the best summary of ICANN's
problems I've seen.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


  • References:
    • RE: [ga] NC BS
      • From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>