ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] NC BS


yep,

Ditto

Joanna Lane wrote:

> Sandy
> > Harris
> > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:39 AM
> > To: ga@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [ga] NC BS
> >
> >
> > "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" wrote:
> >
> > > An ICANN that fails to either limit its mission so that voting isn't
> > > important, or that fails to honor the commitment to 50% control by
> > > an at-large made up predominantly of end-users, is going to be
> > an incumbent
> > > and insider protection society.  Unattractive.  Irresponsible.
> > Unstable.
> > > In fact, doomed.
> >
> > Thank you. That is the best summary of ICANN's
> > problems I've seen.
>
> Certainly the most succinct. I concur.
> Regards,
> Joanna
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>